Cable Assembly
ICT testing is where many cable assembly RFQs stop being theoretical and start becoming production-ready. We review your drawing, BOM, net list, fixture logic, pass/fail limits, and documentation burden before quote so buyers know exactly how continuity, resistance, hipot, insulation checks, and traceability will be controlled before shipment.
Application Context
ICT (in-circuit / electrical) testing is where a cable assembly RFQ stops being theoretical and becomes production-ready. Rather than pricing test as a vague add-on, engineering reviews your net list, connector orientation, expected resistance limits, fixture interface, and failure-report expectations before quotation, so the test scope is aligned to the real assembly risk. The baseline is 100% continuity and miswire detection — opens, shorts, swapped circuits and polarity — with resistance windows, insulation resistance, and hipot added only where voltage class, sealing risk, or customer compliance require it. The point is to match test burden to buyer risk, not to run theater. Where a program needs a dedicated end-of-line test station, we can align this with a wire harness tester program built around the same net list and pass/fail logic.
Test scope scales with the application. Multi-branch industrial and control harnesses rely on continuity and miswire detection to catch connector mix-ups before machine build, while high-voltage cable assemblies add hipot and insulation-resistance windows for objective dielectric release evidence. Whichever level applies, the output is not just a pass light on the tester — it is a release package with lot summary or unit-level records, revision-linked test history, and a certificate of conformance on request that receiving, quality, and program teams can actually use.
Service Scope
Built for buyers who need clear pass/fail logic before they release production quantities
We do not price ICT as a vague add-on. Engineering reviews your net list, connector orientation, expected resistance limits, fixture interface, and failure-report expectations before quotation so the test scope is aligned to the real assembly risk.
ICT programs can include continuity and miswire detection as the baseline, then add resistance windows, insulation resistance, or hipot where voltage class, sealing risk, or customer compliance requires it. The point is to match test burden to buyer risk, not to run theater.
If your customer receiving team, OEM quality group, or regulated project needs proof, we can align the release package to lot traveler, unit record, fixture ID, revision, and certificate needs before production starts.
Engineering Challenges
The cost of an undefined test plan usually appears after the PO is released. We quote against fixture effort, record depth, and acceptance criteria instead of hiding test cost inside a generic production line item.
Missing net-list logic, connector orientation, and expected resistance limits are flagged before the first sample, so buyers compare suppliers on the same scope rather than on assumptions.
Fixture points, adapters, and test-point access are planned up front — because a pass/fail result is only as reliable as the fixture and interface behind it.
Lot traveler, unit record, fixture ID, revision, and certificate needs are aligned before production starts so audit and receiving teams get the evidence they actually require.
Technical Capabilities
Electrical verification matched to buyer risk — continuity and miswire detection as the baseline, with resistance, insulation, and hipot options added by specification.
Manufacturing Process
Quality & Testing
Every ICT program can combine 100% continuity and miswire detection with optional resistance windows, insulation resistance, and hipot by specification — each result captured in a lot summary, unit record, or certificate of conformance so receiving, quality, and program teams have objective release evidence before shipment.
Why WHP
Because the cost of an undefined test plan usually appears after the PO is released
We quote against fixture effort, record depth, and acceptance criteria instead of hiding test cost inside a generic production line item.
Missing net-list logic, connector ambiguity, and report expectations are flagged before the first sample so buyers compare suppliers on the same scope.
Not every harness needs the same burden. We match ICT, resistance, and dielectric checks to voltage class, installation consequence, and buyer documentation needs.
The output is not just a pass light on the tester. It is a release package your receiving, quality, and program teams can actually use.
These references help buyers compare workmanship expectations, electrical-safety context, and documented quality systems before approving a testing supplier.
FAQ
OEM Program Entry
Send your drawing, BOM, net list, quantity, and the test report your buyer or quality team expects. Our engineers will review the electrical verification scope and reply with pricing, lead time, fixture notes, and documentation recommendations for the next procurement step.
Related Capabilities
Verification and assembly services that pair with an ICT testing program.
RFQ Checklist
Representative project type (illustrative)
automotive
During a pre-production sample run, a temporary material shortage threatens the delivery schedule.
Specific tape and wire-color materials are temporarily unavailable, risking delays for the sample run, while the customer still needs the samples urgently and holds strict specifications for the final product.
We propose temporary material substitutions for the sample run only, clearly document the deviation, secure engineering approval, and commit to sourcing the exact original materials for mass production.
Sample production proceeds on schedule, the customer accepts the documented deviations for samples, and production batches adhere to the original specifications.
Reference Bodies
These references help buyers compare workmanship expectations, electrical-safety context, and documented quality systems before approving a testing supplier.